Libraries are for Use

Demonstrating the value of librarianship

Top Ten Questions


This is a follow-up to my previous post on conducting research in an academic library, where I hope to start crystallizing my ideas.  I feel that my MLS, MPH and post-graduate training in epidemiology have helped me prepare for “doing research”.  Towards that end, the first thing to consider are the questions – what do I want to find out?  Here are my Top 10 Questions – Letterman-style:

10.  What factors most affect the quality of a collection?
9.  What are the most valid measures of the quality of a collection?
8.  What are the similarities and differences in quality between open-access and subscription-based resources?
7.  How well would the Howard White-style Brief Tests work for evaluating our collections?
6.  What are the ideal parameter-values for the Brief Tests?
5.  Would a Conspectus method of collection development be effective for our library?
4.  What is the effect of accessibility to the resources in a collection on its usage? (I’m thinking a combination of findability and marketing or awareness)
3.  To what extent does the quality of a collection impact student and research outcomes?
2.  What will be the impact of eliminating resources from our collection on student and research outcomes?
1.  What are the most valid measures of the impact or quality of the non-ejournal electronic resources (e.g. abstract & index databases, audiovisual services, etc.)?

While I actually consider some of the questions in the 5-10 range more important overall, I am compelled to look at questions 1-3 first because of the situation that our library (like many or most libraries) is facing – greater demands with less funding.  I hope to be able to provide the appropriate and valid evidence that would enable us to recommend the (heaven forbid) elimination of the least effective resources.

It will be interesting to return to these questions periodically to see the progress I (hope to) will be making.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Information

This entry was posted on January 19, 2012 by in Assessment, Bibliometrics, Collections, LIS Profession, LIS Research and tagged .

Join 27 other followers

January 2012
M T W T F S S
    Feb »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  
The Scholarly Kitchen

What’s Hot and Cooking In Scholarly Publishing

Libraries are for Use

Demonstrating the value of librarianship

Scholarly Communication | Scoop.it

Demonstrating the value of librarianship

Library & Information Science Research | Scoop.it

Demonstrating the value of librarianship

Library Collections | Scoop.it

Demonstrating the value of librarianship

Lib(rary) Performance

About library statistics & measurement - by Ray Lyons

Walt at Random

Demonstrating the value of librarianship

The Scholarly Kitchen

Demonstrating the value of librarianship

The Quarterly Journal of Economics Current Issue

Demonstrating the value of librarianship

Texas Library Association blogs

Demonstrating the value of librarianship

Demonstrating the value of librarianship

Stephen's Lighthouse

Demonstrating the value of librarianship

ResourceShelf

Demonstrating the value of librarianship

Reference Notes

Demonstrating the value of librarianship

Politifact.com Truth-O-Meter rulings from National

Demonstrating the value of librarianship

Open and Shut?

Demonstrating the value of librarianship

N S R

Demonstrating the value of librarianship

Musings about librarianship

Demonstrating the value of librarianship

LISNews:

Demonstrating the value of librarianship

%d bloggers like this: